Bank Of America’s Unconventional New “Better Balance Rewards” Card

In what can only be described as a radical departure from its longstanding tradition of terrible credit card offerings, Bank of America has introduced a brand new credit card that is arguably not terrible.

It’s called the “Better Balance Rewards” card, and boy is it strange.  Cardholders earn $25 each quarter when they “pay more than the monthly minimum and pay each bill on time” and another $5 per quarter if they also have a “qualifying” (checking, savings, or retirement) account with BoA.  The card has no annual fee.

BoA Better Balance Rewards

The key here is that you have to spend more than the minimum payment each month, which, as a practical matter, means that you have to spend more than $15 each month.  Spending less than $15 won’t work because, in that case, your minimum payment will be equal to your balance and you cannot pay more than your outstanding balance.  So a cardholder could presumably spend $20 on the card each month (though as little as $15.01 should work), and earn $100.  Needless to say, that’s a great return on $240 of spend.

But is it worth applying for?  Perhaps.  On one hand, if used tactically, the card will essentially pay you $100 each year and costs you nothing to own.  And there’s certainly nothing wrong with a free $100 each year.  That said, I’m still not sold on the card because (a) I wouldn’t actually use the card (aside from the $20/month), and (b) when I apply for a credit card purely for a bonus I expect at least $500 worth of value, and I simply don’t believe that the terms of the Better Balance Rewards card will last long enough for me to recoup my $500 opportunity cost.  In fact, I’d imagine that these $25 quarterly bonuses will be ratcheted down or entirely eliminated within a few years.

Note: I certainly wouldn’t recommend opening a BoA checking or savings account for an extra $5 of rewards per quarter.  BoA checking accounts require you to either jump through hoops or pay a monthly fee, and BoA savings accounts are downright patheticYou’re much better off with Ally Bank on both fronts.

Either way, this is certainly an interesting experiment by Bank of America.  They’re banking (sorry) on the profits generated by “legitimate” cardholders far outweighing the losses generated by people who use the card as I’ve outlined above.  Perhaps they’ll be proven correct; perhaps not.  What do you think?

Hat tip: Wallaby

  • Guest

    Although negligible, you forgot to mention that it costs next to nothing to own the card but not truly nothing. Depending on how reasonable one may consider, there is the critical element of a balance being carried through the year which will be charged an interest rate forgoing any promotionals.
    This is the amount they recoup from you and are counting on if you are not smart about using it.

    • David

      Same response here as below — there is no requirement to carry a balance on the card.

  • so junk

    You seemed to indicate it costs nothing to own but depending on how people use the card it may cost far too much.
    The CRITICAL ELEMENT you forgot to mention is that in order to yield rewards this card forces you to carry a balance through the year.
    After any promotionals, if you still want the rewards you MUST carry a balance which will cost you money from APR rates applied on it.

    • David

      I actually don’t think that’s correct… There is no requirement to carry a balance on the card in order to receive the quarterly bonus. You merely have to pay more than the minimum required payment, which requires you to charge more than the minimum payment ($15) each month but does not preclude you from paying the entire balance each month.